Rob's Royals Ramblings

General thoughts about the Royals and anything else

Sunday, April 23, 2006

Something positive for a change!

Well, I think we saw a little of what Allard envisioned from Jeremy Affeldt today. His tempo was good, he kept the ball down for the most part and he worked ahead in the count. That's two consecutive nice starts for the southpaw, and while I gripe about him when he does bad, that just means that I should give credit when he does well. Nice job today, Jeremy. Please keep it up!

Johnny Buck (who is my favorite current Royal) is looking more and more like a frontline catcher in the majors. I'm sure his power will come, but he's more of a line drive hitter, so he might not hit much more than 15-18 homers per year. Add that to a .250-.260 average and hopefully 60-70 rbi's? I'd take that in a heartbeat. We haven't seen those numbers (which I believe would have him in the top ten of catchers the past couple seasons) since the days of Mike Macfarlane or Darrell Porter.

Angel Berroa continues to make the spectacular plays look routine. Another sparking double play today after last night's effort shows all the Royals fans why Allard and the Royals signed him to that extension a couple years ago.

Two out of three is a good start to the homestand. And after that winless roadtrip, it's a fantastic start. Hopefully, the boys got their really bad play (and luck when you consider all the injuries) out of the way early.

Okay, enough positive stuff for the day...it's just not natural for me!

GO ROYALS!!

Obnoxious fans

I was at the game last night and while it was nice to see the Royals win for a change, I've got something I need to get off my chest.

I understand that people like to have a good time at the ballpark, but for crying out loud, do you have to shout out profanities to do it?

Maybe it was the fact that it was buck night that brought out some rude people (beer induced maybe?), but I cringed every time I heard the bs, mf or f words being bandied about.

I didn't even see an usher around to talk to about this and that's what's really annoying. So, I let them know that I didn't appreciate their vulgarity and tried to tune them out the rest of the night.

This is why I don't care to come to the park on buck nights. And I wouldn't have this time except my partial season tickets fell on it this day.

At least the Royals won!

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse

Well, if you're a Royals fan, you instinctively know that it can and will get worse, which is exactly the way this road trip unfolded.

9 consecutive losses on the road, 10 in a row overall. That's just ridiculous for a major league team.

I know, I know, the Royals aren't a major league team. Right now, I don't see how the players and coaches can even want to come back home after this road trip. Think about it for a second. Royals Nation was booing Mike Sweeney and his check swings before the first loss was official, so do you think the response will be cordial this Friday evening at Kauffman?

It's going to be brutal and rightly so. That is, assuming that anyone bothers to show up for the game besides the Royals, Indians, umpires, broad casters and stadium personnel.

What a statement that would send to David, Dan and Allard if nobody showed up AT ALL for the first game back after a winless road trip!

The thing is, I don't think it would even register in their pea-brains.

Sunday, April 16, 2006

Same Old, Same Old

Well, it's 10 games into the 2006 season (otherwise known as Royals purgatory for the remaining KC fanbase) and the boys in blue are looking for another record-breaking season.

Unfortunately, it's looking like another franchise shattering record for losses at their current pace, maybe even a major league record if things don't turn around very quickly.

Who's going to lead them? Buddy Bell? HA! That's a laugh.

Right now, what's left of the Royals fans are seeing an exact duplicate of Tony Pena in Buddy Bell, as far as managerial brains are concerned.

Of course, you're only as good as the players you have, so thanks to Allard Baird and David Glass, Buddy's really behind the 8-ball, given his lack of ability to manage a game with any foresight whatsoever.

Mr. Bell had a career .422 winning percentage as a manager coming into the 2006 season. And so far this year, it's gone down even further after a scintillating 2-8 start that threatens to doom the Royals to their 11th losing season in the last 14.

It's obvious to any Royals fan that Allard Baird, David Glass, and Dan Glass hired the least expensive manager that was available.

How budget conscious of the Royals. After all, they are rolling back prices everyday! ****extreme sarcasm****

As a lifelong Royals fan, I have finally hit my limit with the amount of ridiculously inept and downright stupid decisions made by the front office and managerial staff of this organization.

When the Royals hired Buddy Bell, I was stupefied. I couldn't believe that they hired the worst possible manager for the job, but in hindsight it makes perfect sense.

Especially if they are trying to get the Royals to be contracted after the current deal runs out.

Thursday, April 13, 2006

Negative By Nature

Well, the debacle that was the Yankees series is now complete. Leave it to the Royals to completely demoralize their fan base with a completely, utterly worthless effort in the Bronx.

I know, why do anything different in New York than they do in KC, right?

Sigh.

Well, on paper it would seem that their next opponent should give the Royals a chance to win, but we saw what "on paper" meant in 2004 didn't we?

I like Tampa's young core, but they're hamstrung like the Royals. Poor scouting, poor management and a distinct reluctance to spend much money can really hamper a team.

It ought to be interesting to see if Scott Elarton can make a third straight strong start. If not, nobody here in Kansas City will be surprised.

This road trip has a distinct possibility of being an oh-for.

Imagine that, the Royals 2-12 and 10 or so games out by the middle of April. Wouldn't that be fun?

I can't wait to see what the fans do when the blue boys come back after this road trip! If the players thought the fans were brutal before, they better be wearing earplugs if this road trip doesn't turn around quickly.

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

Auuuggghhhh!

The matchup between the Royals and Yankees used to be the marquee matchup of the American League.

Unfortunately, those days are long gone and lately the only headlines involving the Royals aren't very complimentary. Nor should they be. This team has lost 486 games over the past five seasons (489 counting this year's losses coming into today's game) and averaging 98 losses per season.

Add today's loss to the Yankees in the Bronx to that list.

Joe Mays, pitching more like Charlie Brown, couldn't even get out of the 3rd inning in the Yankees home opener.

But, still the Royals managed to battle back and take a 7-4 lead into the 8th inning behind the relief pitching of Mike Wood and Elmer Dessens, who to this point in the young season has arguably been the Royals best offseason acquisition.

This is where the Royals managerial prowess is called into question by a lot of people.

Instead of leaving Dessens, who's only thrown 19 pitches in his 2 innings of work, in to pitch the 8th inning, Buddy Bell calls in the large lefty, Andrew Sisco.

Most baseball people would tell you it was the right move bringing in the southpaw to face Giambi, Matsui, and Posada. Two lefties and a switch-hitter. Heck, the next three were Cano, Williams and Damon, also two lefties and a switch-hitter.

It's called playing the percentages and Buddy Bell got burned because Andrew Sisco, after looking like a veteran southpaw most of last season, is looking like a rushed rule 5 guy this season.

Myself, I don't have a problem with bringing in a lefty at that point, but with Sisco's struggles so far, I would have liked to see Gobble come in instead. Maybe it would have played out the same way, but there's no way to know. Maybe Gobble shuts them down 1-2-3 in the 8th (hey, it's a hypothetical situation, it COULD happen!).

That obviously didn't happen, but the coup de grace was Ambiorix Burgos' meat pitch to Captain Yankee, Derek Jeter.

Say so long to your lil friend, Ambiorix, and also say so long to the Royals lead.

Sigh.

The Royals streak continues in the Bronx.

Positives
1. Resiliency of the Royals - Once they got down early, against the Yanks on opening day, it would have been really easy to just lay down. This team didn't and as a Royals fan, you have to like that. A lot!
2. Angel Berroa - Another solid day at bat and a good day in the field. Hopefully he keeps playing like this.
3. Elmer Dessens - Yet another outstanding performance from the journeyman hurler. Obviously this stretch of excellence probably won't last the season, but you take advantage of it while it does, Buddy!
4. Reggie Sanders - 6 games, 2 homers, 7 rbi's. Finally, we've got some legit protection behind Sweeney.

Negatives
1. Joe Mays - He's had two starts and hasn't made it a complete 5 innings yet. His status in the rotation is shaky if Runelvys can get back to speed in the minors.
2. Buddy Bell - A manager has to know when to trust his gut and when to play the percentages. His overall record of 388-531 coming into the season doesn't give me much hope that he'll become the next Whitey Herzog or Dick Howser.
3. Mike Sweeney - The captain takes another horse collar and also gets plunked in the 9th, forcing him from the game. Mike's slow start isn't unusual, but we're just waiting for his annual trip to the DL.

Sunday, April 09, 2006

Luke Hudson - April 8 vs Chicago

As I was watching this game, I realized that sometimes the results in the boxscore don't really match what happened in the game.

Just check out Luke Hudson's line in yesterday's game against Chicago.

1 IP, 1 H, 0 ER, 0 R, 0 BB, 0 K

Most of the time, you'd think that the pitcher in question was throwing the ball pretty good, right? Me too, except this time we'd be wrong.

AJ Pierzynski, who looked absolutely foolish against Denny Bautista, rips the second pitch from Hudson into right, giving the Sox only their second hit on the day.

Next up is Joe Crede. After falling behind 1-2, he lashes a drive to right center that Reggie Sanders is able to run down for the first out, primarily because it is slicing back towards him.

Rob Mackowiak is the next batter and he just turns on the first pitch from Hudson, nearly taking Doug Mientkiewicz's glove off, but luckily for KC, Grudzielanek is backing him up and is able to make the play as Dougie scrambles back to first in time for the throw. Pierzynski, meanwhile, makes it into scoring position at second base.

So, now it's two outs, man in scoring position for Juan Uribe. On the 1-1 pitch, Uribe launches a ball to deep left center that Shane Costa is able to run under only because the wind blowing in from left kept the ball in the park. Any other day, that ball is over the fountains, because that thing was mashed.

Sure, Hudson did get the job done in this case, but as you can see it could have been much different if it wasn't a very windy afternoon at the K.

Was it the breath of the baseball gods? Could the Royals finally be starting to get some breaks for them rather than seemingly always against them?

Nah, it was just a windy day, but I'm sure all of us Royals fans and the Royals will certainly take whatever help we can get at this point! :)

GO ROYALS!!

Saturday, April 08, 2006

Curiousity got the better of me today.

After watching last night's stirring comeback by the Royals, I started thinking about the worst teams in baseball history. My criteria to be included in the "worst of the worst" was this: Either the team lost over 100 games or their winning percentage was .333 or lower.

My way of thinking about a 162 game season is this. You'll most likely win 54, and lose 54, so that means the other 54 is where you really make your season, which coincidentally enough, matches up with the .333 winning percentage criteria!

Most people think that the 1962 New York Mets (40-120 .250 60.5 games behind San Francisco) were the worst team in history, well that's not entirely true. At least, not if you go entirely by winning percentage. In my research(thanks baseball-reference.com) I found a couple teams since the 1901 season that could certainly lay claim to the worst of all time.

The 1916 Philadelphia Athletics were a horrific 36-117 for a .235 winning percentage while finishing 54.5 games behind the Boston Red Sox.

The 1935 Boston Braves were 38-115 for a .248 winning percentage while finishing 61.5 games behind the Chicago Cubs.

Let's take a look at some corresponding categories, shall we?

Runs per game
1935 - Lge Avg - 4.71
Boston's - 3.76 Sc0red - ranked last 5.57 Allowed - ranked last
1916 - Lge Avg - 3.68
Philly's - 2.90 Scored - ranked last 5.04 Allowed - ranked last
1962 - Lge Avg - 4.48
NY's - 3.83 Scored - ranked next to last 5.89 Allowed - ranked last

Error/Fielding Pct
1935 - Boston 197 total errors - Fielding PCT .967 - ranked third to last
Top Fielding team in 1935 - St Louis 163 total errors - .972 Fielding PCT
1916 - Philly 312 total errors - Fielding PCT .952 - ranked last
Top Fielding team in 1916 - Boston 183 total errors - .972 Fielding PCT
1962 - NY 210 total errors - Fielding PCT .967 - ranked last
Top Fielding team in 1962 - Milwaukee 123 total errors - .980 Fielding PCT

What does this prove? Not much. While the Mets lay claim to having the most losses in history, I think there's at least two other teams that can certainly contend for the crown of "worst" team in major league baseball history.

The list of worst teams ever (since 1901 & using AL, NL and Federal League info):
1903 NL St Louis 43-94 .314
1903 AL Washington 43-94 .314
1904 AL Washington 38-113 .252
1905 NL Boston 51-103 .331
1905 NL Brooklyn 48-104 .316
1906 AL Boston 49-105 .318
1906 NL Boston 49-102 .325
1907 AL Washington 49-102 .325
1908 AL New York 51-103 .331
1908 NL St Louis 49-105 .318
1909 AL Washington 42-110 .276
1909 NL Boston 45-108 .294
1910 AL St Louis 47-107 .305
1911 AL St Louis 45-107 .296
1911 NL Boston 44-107 .291
1912 AL New York 50-101 .329
1914 AL Cleveland 51-102 .333
1915 AL Philadelphia 43-109 .289
1915 FL Baltimore 47-107 .305
1916 AL Philadelphia 36-117 .235
1917 NL Pittsburgh 51-103 .331
1919 AL Philadelphia 36-104 .257
1920 AL Philadelphia 48-106 .312
1921 NL Philadelphia 51-103 .331
1923 NL Philadelphia 50-104 .325
1925 AL Boston 47-105 .309
1926 AL Boston 46-107 .301
1927 AL Boston 51-103 .331
1927 NL Philadelphia 51-103 .331
1928 NL Boston 50-103 .327
1928 NL Philadelphia 43-109 .283
1932 AL Chicago 49-102 .325
1932 AL Boston 43-111 .279
1935 NL Boston 38-115 .248
1937 AL St Louis 46-108 .299
1938 NL Philadelphia 45-105 .300
1939 AL St Louis 43-111 .279
1939 NL Philadelphia 45-106 .298
1940 NL Philadelphia 50-103 .327
1941 NL Philadelphia 43-111 .279
1942 NL Philadelphia 42-109 .278
1943 AL Philadelphia 49-105 .318
1945 NL Philadelphia 46-108 .299
1946 AL Philadelphia 49-105 .318
1949 AL Washington 50-104 .325
1952 AL Detroit 50-104 .325
1952 NL Pittsburgh 42-112 .273
1953 NL Pittsburgh 50-104 .325
1954 AL Baltimore 54-100 .351
1954 AL Philadelphia 51-103 .331
1954 NL Pittsburgh 53-101 .344
1955 AL Washington 53-101 .344
1956 AL Kansas City 52-102 .338
1961 AL Washington 61-100 .379
1961 AL Kansas City 61-100 .379
1961 NL Philadelphia 47-107 .305
1962 AL Washington 60-101 .373
1962 NL Chicago 59-103 .364
1962 NL New York 40-120 .250
1963 AL Washington 56-106 .346
1963 NL New York 51-111 .315
1964 AL Washington 62-100 .383
1964 AL Kansas City 57-105 .352
1964 NL New York 53-109 .327
1965 AL Boston 62-100 .383
1965 AL Kansas City 59-103 .364
1965 NL New York 50-112 .309
1966 NL Chicago 59-103 .364
1967 NL New York 61-101 .377
1969 NL Montreal 52-110 .321
1969 NL San Diego 52-110 .321
1970 AL Chicago 56-106 .346
1971 AL Cleveland 60-102 .370
1971 NL San Diego 61-100 .379
1972 AL Texas 54-100 .351
1973 AL Texas 57-105 .352
1973 NL San Diego 60-102 .370
1974 NL San Diego 60-102 .370
1975 AL Detroit 57-102 .358
1976 NL Montreal 55-107 .340
1977 AL Toronto 54-107 .335
1977 NL Atlanta 61-101 .377
1978 AL Toronto 59-102 .366
1978 AL Seattle 56-104 .350
1979 AL Toronto 53-109 .327
1979 AL Oakland 54-108 .333
1980 AL Seattle 59-103 .364
1982 AL Minnesota 60-102 .370
1982 NL Cincinnati 61-101 .377
1983 AL Seattle 60-102 .370
1985 AL Cleveland 60-102 .370
1985 NL Pittsburgh 57-104 .354
1985 NL San Francisco 62-100 .383
1987 AL Cleveland 61-101 .377
1988 AL Baltimore 54-107 .335
1988 AL Atlanta 54-106 .338
1989 AL Detroit 59-103 .364
1991 AL Cleveland 57-105 .352
1993 NL New York 59-103 .364
1993 NL San Diego 61-101 .377
1996 AL Detroit 53-109 .327
1998 NL Florida 54-108 .333
2001 AL Tampa Bay 62-100 .383
2001 NL Pittsburgh 62-100 .383
2002 AL Tampa Bay 55-106 .342
2002 AL Kansas City 62-100 .383
2002 AL Detroit 55-106 .342
2002 NL Milwaukee 56-106 .346
2003 AL Detroit 43-119 .265
2004 AL Kansas City 58-104 .358
2004 NL Arizona 51-111 .315
2005 AL Kansas City 56-106 .346

Friday, April 07, 2006

Ugly Beginning

Well, I plopped down in the old recliner tonight and turned on the Royals game via the Extra Innings package.

Boy was that a mistake! The White Sox scored 5 runs in the first off our "outstanding" southpaw Jeremy Affeldt. 4 hits and 2 walks in the first 6 batters was simply horrific, but I couldn't turn away. In many ways, it was like watching a car crash. You know you should turn away, but you just can't.

I mentioned on the Royals fan forum, but I'll reiterate it here. I wonder if Jeremy, Joe Mays, and Doug Mientkiewicz heard the raucous cheers from the Kauffman faithful after Affeldt's two strikeouts in the second inning? After all, they heard the boos that cascaded down previously.

It's now in the third inning but Affeldt's in trouble again....sigh. I think I'll go take a shower.

Thursday, April 06, 2006

Well, they didn't lose today

Of course, they didn't play either, but hey, when you've seen nearly 400 losses in the past 4 seasons, you take what little victories you can get! :)

I've seen several quotes from various players about how the Royals fans should back off in their booing of Mike Sweeney in particular, and the Royals in general. Let's take a look at this phenomenon, shall we?

The Royals have managed one winning season in the past 10 seasons. In fact, the last time the Royals finished above .500 in consecutive seasons was 1993-94. To give you some perspective, George Brett was still playing in 1993 and 1994 was the strike shortened season where Hal McRae was canned after leading the Royals to a 14 game winning streak right before the strike hit.

So, Doug Mientkiewicz, Joe Mays and Jeremy Affeldt have taken it upon themselves to "protect" their teammates from the heartless and ruthless Royals fans that would dare boo such a hard-working and dedicated team.

Quoting Joe Mays from the Royals website, "The fans need to back off a little." Huh? You've been here five minutes and you're going to tell what's left of the Royals fanbase to keep quiet? Tell you what Joe, once you've been through the purgatory that is Kansas City baseball, then you can tell the Royals fans what to do. Until then? Keep your nicely paid mouth shut and try to do your job a little better than you did on Wednesday.

Quoting Doug Mientkiewicz from the KC Star website, "Getting on your own team sends a bad message around the league." Say what? It sends the message that the fans are sick and tired of the status quo. This ain't Boston or New York, Dougie. This team hasn't been winning consistently ever since the explosion of salaries in the 90's. Again, once you've had to endure what the Royals faithful has, you can tell us to shut up. For now, take your World Series ball and shove it.

And then, of course, there's Jeremy Affeldt's quote from the Royals website, "Booing is not going to help." Jeremy, you would certainly know that booing doesn't help since you've gotten your share of boos from the crowds at Kauffman the past few seasons. But if you're so concerned with what sound is coming from the fans, then you obviously can't keep your focus on the field. But that's no surprise to anyone that's seen you pitch. Tell ya what, lefty, why don't you try to actually earn your money for a change?

Harsh? Maybe. Honest? Definitely. The time has come for Royals fans to be a little meaner, a little rougher and a little more demanding. Afterall, the Royals used to be the model expansion franchise. Now, they look more like a model contraction franchise.

GO ROYALS!

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

April 5, 2006 : Royals 2006 - Zero and Two

Well, it's only two games into the 2006 season and it's already looking bleak for the boys in blue. While the home opener was a good game in defeat, it didn't take long for the Royals to show how ugly this season has the possibility to become.

8 home runs allowed in two games. EIGHT! That's on pace to surrender an astounding 648 homers this season. Obviously that won't happen, but it's disturbing to see the balls flying out of Kauffman Stadium at that rate anytime, let alone right out of the gate.

I'll admit to being one of the many people at Kauffman that booed Mike Sweeney in the opener. After much thought and reading many others same and dissenting opinions on the matter, I've come to the conclusion that I'd do it again. There's not many ways that fans can let the players, coaches and front office know how they're doing. Cheering, booing, coming to the games and staying away are pretty much it. As a Royals fan that's watched the putridity (is that a word? who knows!) that's come out of the Heartland the past few years, I think that the boos were more of a culmination of frustration at Mike and the team. Should Mike have gotten booed? Depends on who you ask, but obviously I don't have a problem with it.

I see that Angel Berroa is continuing to keep his head in the clouds as he booted his first ball of the year, but that's not what concerns me about him. The fact that he got picked off again today (how many times has he gotten picked off the past 3 years anyway?) is what's rubbing me the wrong way. Is it that hard to keep your head in the game? Apparently it is for Mr. Berroa. What's even worse is that no one on the Royals even tries to make him accountable for his screwups.

While I'm very skeptical about how the Royals will do, there's nothing I can do about it. Except cheer for them, boo them when necessary, go to my 20+ allotted games or maybe skip a few if they continue down the three digit loss road that they've managed to do 3 of the past 4 seasons.

All I can say is GO ROYALS!!!

Rob